U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessant seeks to negotiate more time.

Trump Delays Implementation of Reciprocal Tariffs

According to informed sources,Foreign exchange trading institution ranking U.S. President Trump has decided to delay the implementation of the so-called "reciprocal tariffs" until August 1. Previously, these postponed reciprocal tariffs were scheduled to take effect at 12:01 AM on Wednesday. On Monday, Trump announced an extension of the deadline by three weeks, while also sending letters to several countries warning them of the new tariff rates they would face.

Behind this decision was the influence of advisors like U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Besent. They suggested "extending the deadline could facilitate more trade agreements", noting that as the original tariff activation date approached, negotiations with trade partners such as India and the EU had progressed, requiring more time to reach agreements. Ultimately, Trump accepted this recommendation, changing his earlier intent to implement the tariffs immediately.

Besent's Key Role in Tariff Decisions

As a key advisor to Trump, Besent played an important role in the adjustment of tariff policies. In April of this year, he successfully persuaded Trump to postpone the implementation of the "Liberation Day tariffs", which could have caused global market turbulence, by 90 days. In the recent adjustment of the tariff deadline, Besent informed Trump that "several agreements are close to completion but need more time," which was a vital factor in Trump's decision to change his approach.

Prior to the official announcement of the tariff delay on Monday, Trump had consulted with allies over the phone and privately at his private golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, over the weekend. At that time, he was weighing two options: setting a new deadline for August or announcing new tariff rates without a specific effective date. Additionally, Trump had previously expressed a tendency to forgo avoiding tariffs through negotiation, but under the persuasion of Besent and others, he ultimately opted to allow more time for negotiations.

Negotiation Progress and Impact Behind Tariff Delay

The delay in tariff implementation has provided more room for negotiations between the U.S. and multiple trade partners. Currently, trade talks with India, the EU, and others have made some progress, and the extended deadline is expected to increase the likelihood of reaching agreements. For the U.S., securing favorable trade agreements through negotiation might achieve its trade goals more effectively than directly imposing tariffs, reducing the negative impact of tariffs on the domestic economy and consumers.

However, this delay does not come without risks. The uncertainty surrounding tariff policies may cause trade partners to make more cautious decisions and could affect market confidence in the stability of U.S. trade policies. Nevertheless, from the current situation, the Trump administration is evidently more inclined to first seek more favorable trade terms through negotiations, with the support of Besent and others providing the time window needed for this strategy.

In the next three weeks, negotiations between the U.S. and its trade partners will become the focal point. If multiple trade agreements can be reached during this time, it will undoubtedly help ease global trade tensions. If negotiations do not proceed smoothly, the imposition of tariffs after August 1 may introduce new changes to the global trade landscape, thereby affecting the recovery process of the global economy. Markets will also closely monitor the latest developments in negotiations and the subsequent adjustments in U.S. tariff policies.

Risk Warning and Disclaimer

The market carries risks, and investment should be cautious. This article does not constitute personal investment advice and has not taken into account individual users' specific investment goals, financial situations, or needs. Users should consider whether any opinions, viewpoints, or conclusions in this article are suitable for their particular circumstances. Investing based on this is at one's own responsibility.

Very good!（91）